Mapa de Fallos de GDAX
El siguiente mapa de fallos muestra las ubicaciones más recientes en todo el mundo donde los usuarios de GDAX informaron sus problemas e interrupciones. Si tiene un problema con GDAX y su área no aparece en la lista, asegúrese de enviar un reporte a continuación.
El mapa de calor anterior muestra dónde se agrupan geográficamente los reportes más recientes enviados por usuarios y de redes sociales. La densidad de estos informes se representa mediante la escala de colores, como se muestra a continuación.
Usuarios de GDAX users afectados:
GDAX es una casa de cambio de criptomonedas que ofrece a las instituciones y profesionales la capacidad de comerciar con una variedad de monedas digitales como Bitcoin, Ethereum y más en un intercambio regulado basado en los EE. UU. GDAX es propiedad y está operado por Coinbase.
Lugares Más Afectados
Reportes de fallos e interrupciones de los últimos 15 días se originaron desde:
| Lugar | Reportes |
|---|
Discusión comunitaria
¿Consejos? ¿Frustraciones? Compártelos aquí. Los comentarios útiles incluyen una descripción del problema, la ciudad y el código postal.
Tenga cuidado con los "números de soporte" o las cuentas de "recuperación" que se pueden publicar a continuación. Asegúrate de informar y votar negativamente esos comentarios. Evite publicar su información personal.
Reportes de Fallos de GDAX
Los últimos problemas e interrupciones reportados en social media:
-
Grok (@grok) reportó@nexpotus @FitLikeMummy @BTC_Archive Bitcoin did briefly flash crash to $0.06 on GDAX (Coinbase) in April 2017 due to a system issue, but it was from ~$1,200, not $10k. The 2011 Mt. Gox hack saw it drop to $0.01 from $32. Stink bids are smart—always good to have them ready!
-
AQPulse (@AQPulse) reportóLong-term $1,000 can stay in the conversation. This weekly chart says the real battle is happening much earlier. $TSLA is sitting right on a major decision layer where channel support, trend support, and price memory are all meeting near 360. At the same time, the weekly GDAX EMA stack has rolled lower and price is still trapped below the 391 to 405 reclaim zone. That matters. Because this is usually where strong narratives either regain structure or start slipping into trend transition. My read here: Hold 360 and reclaim 391 to 405, and TSLA can start rebuilding toward the 480 area and keep the larger channel intact. Lose 360 cleanly, and the chart starts opening toward a much deeper reset, with 247 standing out as the bigger structural support. The upside story gets attention. The decision layer is where money gets made or trapped. AQPulse tracks that layer first.
-
Blaine Coury (@BlaineCoury) reportó@coinbase I've been a longtime Gdax and @CoinbasePro customer typically tolerating your above average fees in exchange for quality @CoinbaseSupport liquidity and uptime. I was happy to learn you were supporting the #FlareNetwork FLR airdrop and held my #xrp on your exchange
-
memo (@mrtom31) reportó@zhusu There are issue with GDAX especially when there is dump in BTC. Last one few days ago GDAX was inaccessible. During the drop USDC droped to of -16%. How can you win a trade like this?
-
Grok (@grok) reportó@stansilver2024 @saylordocs Researched claims: No evidence of personal "inside wash trading" or criminal acts by Brian Armstrong. Coinbase (as company) settled 2021 CFTC case for $6.5M over 2015-2018 bot/employee self-trades inflating volumes on GDAX (e.g., one ex-staffer did ~99% fake LTC trades). Called reckless, not intentional; no customer harm, no guilt admitted. Ongoing civil shareholder suits target exec disclosures on custody/AML/listings and 2021 stock sales (internal probe cleared them; no wash trading alleged). Standard fintech scrutiny, no convictions.
-
Grok (@grok) reportó@stansilver2024 @saylordocs Researched claims: No evidence of personal "inside wash trading" or criminal acts by Brian Armstrong. Coinbase (as company) settled 2021 CFTC case for $6.5M over 2015-2018 bot/employee self-trades inflating volumes on GDAX (e.g., one ex-staffer did ~99% fake LTC trades). Called reckless, not intentional; no customer harm, no guilt admitted. Ongoing civil shareholder suits target exec disclosures on custody/AML/listings and 2021 stock sales (internal probe cleared them; no wash trading alleged). Standard fintech scrutiny, no convictions.
-
American Creed, SCH (@ACFederation) reportó@soupcanarchist If the internet is down or GDAX's are forced to freeze assets... you are going to want to be holding silver as well.
-
Đan Coffman 🏴🛡 (@dan_coff) reportó@JasonYanowitz CB Pro predated the Paradex acc by at least 2 years -- it was just called GDAX. Paradex was shut down shortly after acquisition. It isn't accurate to say it became Pro. CB picked up at least one great and really funny engineer tho.
-
Coinr2014 (@coinr2014) reportó@SoldNever @dredoggyx @MattWallace888 You said bitcoin crashed to $.06 4 years ago. It was a gdax glitch, no other sites had that price. It was a company issue not the price of bitcoin. Last time bitcoin was $.06 was back in 2010 ish.
-
Mark Adam ⚡️ (@mark_adam) reportó@coinbase gdax coming back because “advanced trade” is so awful?
-
Art Masters NFT 🎨 Foundation 🏢 Community 🗺️ Art (@ArtMastersNFT) reportó@Coinbase_NFT We were first adopters of #Coinbase, Coinbase Pro (GDAX), Coinbase Wallet with 330 #NFTs, Early Access first signups links tweets, we still don't get access, that's how low class this is. Heavy curation for select few, that's how this bs works.
-
TyCobbFan (@fan_cobb) reportóim old enough to remember when it was still called gdax and some people bought eth under $1 (down from$300) late one night because someone ran through all the stops and forced puked everyone
-
James (@sometrader78) reportó@JasonThePleb Total **** show over there. They were so much better when they were GDAX. I have no idea what happened.
-
tekkaadan (@tekkaadan) reportó@tmuxvim GDAX was ******* atrocious and at that time, working in crypto was very exciting. There was purpose if what people were doing.
-
Theta Research & Capital (@Crypto_MoonKid) reportó@TraderMercury Literally. Agree 100%. Support is not existent, fees are completely nuts. At least gdax had 0 maker fees back in the day. Nowadays avoid at all costs.